Skip to content


What if we axed press releases altogether?

“What if…?” scenarios are a great way to get the lazy mind to excercise. They help think, what previously might have been considered unthinkable – or just so commonplace and conventional wisdom that you just wouldn’t bother. Press releases are such a largely unquestioned thing. “If you want PR for your firm, write press releases. The more the better, ideally at least one or two every week.” So, or similar, goes the song that at least the majority of US tech companies sing when they hire a European PR agency. They want us to replicate what they do in the States: flood the media with heaps of – let’s face it – useless, meaningless, hollow, fake, gibberish bullshit. Elsewhere on the web there’s a name for that sort of unsolicited messages. It’s called spam.

Trust me, I know what I’m talking about. I’ve heard smart PR officers at tech companies say things like “I know this release won’t get much pickup in Europe, but we need to get this out to the press.” Hell, why? Are they just mindless robots executing commands, no matter how useful or useless, or what? Not to be mistaken, there are many very smart PROs in US companies who actually want and listen to advice their European agency gives them, but why don’t others?

On the other side of the table, there’s us. The PR guys in agencies or at local subsidiaries of those (sometimes not so) far-away companies. We’re usually so busy fending off the rubbish releases that corporate gives us that we don’t really question the ones that we write up ourselves. Sometimes, there’s real news after all, and that must be of interest to someone! So we put time and energy in the announcement, draft, edit and proof read it, submit the copy to the client for review, incorporate his changes and comments, send it for final approval, it sometimes goes through legal and needs to be entirely re-written and when it’s finally ready to hit the inboxes of those really important key journalists, guess what happens? It get’s postponed by a week or five, because the one customer quote in it wasn’t really as approved as the client thought it was. And when it is finally sent out – oh glorious moment of truth! – it gets deleted by the ungrateful journalist who thought it was still rubbish.

Where’s the value?
Why all the effort? Why all that time? What if we abandoned press releases altogether? Would it change anything? What would the value lost be if we actually did forget about press releases? Would we really miss those little nibs of news coverage in 12 lines in the news section of that trade magazine? Would our clients miss them? Would it make our client or company any less relevant, would it impact their reputation? I strongly doubt it. At least I think a huge proportion of the releases sent out daily could be just as well dropped in the bin from the outset, because they carry no value, neither news value nor caloric, for that matter.

The one exception to the rule
Of course there are some instances, when a press release makes good sense. That’s when you have an almost 100% guarantee that it will be picked up by newswires. When a DAX30 or FTSE100 company makes a major announcement, you can be sure it will be read by AP, dpa, AFP, DowJones and whoever editors and passed on over the wire. As many dailies and onlines take their share of fresh “news” from those wires, the release has some value to it. But only as long as you’re big enough, or you have something really cool to say. And I mean REALLY interesting. Everything else is still just rubbish.

Letting people know by other means
“But how do we let the world know that we’re here, that we have something interesting so say, that we have a cool new product, that we’ve found the alchemist formula to make gold out of rocks…?,” you ask. Well, imagine there were no journalists, no press in the old sense of the term. No publishing houses that pay skilled writers to write articles about things they think are of interest to readers that pay for copies of printed dead trees that carry colourful pages of advertising that make for even more dead trees but bring in the money to pay the publisher and the skilled writer. Nothing of that sort. Not even online. Imagine that. How would people find out what’s interesting to THEM?

Note the words “find out”. Yes, people want to find out. They want answers to their questions. How do they get those answers? They search! They use Google. That simple! That’s where your company needs to be. On Google and all the other search engines. Of course you could pay for being on Google by buying AdWords, but be honest, how often have you clicked on those Google ads yourself? People want the answers straight from the horses’ mouth, from a trusted horse that is. And which horse would you trust your ride on? Which oracle’s answers to your questions would you trust?

In a world without press releases, it’s all about trusting relationships. About trustworthy content that does not come disguised in sleek, toned-down, corporate gobbledygook but just as the author meant it to sound.

Just for the sake of explanation, let me give you an example of the importance of relationships from my work with – you guessed it – journalists. In my work, the best response from journalists comes when they have known me for a while (Hey, that’s already a good reason to hire a PR person!) and when I tell them a story about my clients and what makes my clients special. To their readers, not to the journalists themselves.

I work in tech and digital media PR. In Germany that’s not the area where you get a lot of spontaneous inquiries from journalists. You have to earn their attention. With good stories, genuinely interesting interview partners, and with a pitch with no strings attached. If they happen to like your story the moment you call, great! If they have a different agenda for today, fine too! If they know you, they’ll be open to listen to you again next time – or even call you when they have a story coming up that your client would add an interesting angle to. It’s all about relationships. Press releases don’t carry relationships. So why rely on them to “get ink”?

So who should you build trusting relationships with?
In a world without press, and without press releases, your audience would still be looking for answers on the web. If there’s no press to carry your story and make it findable, you’ll have to take care of that bit yourself. Publish! Blog! Talk about yourself, what you’re up to, what bothers you, what your plans are. Let the people looking for answers get to know you better. That’s the first bit.

The second, and even more important part is: Talk about your customers, your clients and their problems. And how you solve them. You have a great product? Talk about how it solves its buyer’s problems. You sell services? Let your audience know what they can achieve by giving you their custom. You help THEM find answers to THEIR problems.

Thirdly: Listen. Listen hard. And even harder. Because only by understanding the problems and questions of your peers, customers, prospects, etc., you will be able to give good answers. Good answers are not “developed” in positioning workshops or messaging sessions. Good answers are not mission statements and don’t fit on powerpoint slides. Good answers originate in listening to the question, understanding it, checking it against the sounding board of your own experience, and giving it back in the words that the asker understands.

Respect the rules of the bargain
Trusted relationships online are based on a bargain. As long as the asker gets a good answer and feels that it comes from genuine experience and good will, no strings attached, he or she will give you their trust. It’s a give and get game. If you’re good at giving answers, you might even get money in return. If you ask for the money up front, they’ll turn their backs on you and you lose. Not only their trust, but also their respect.

In a world without press releases, there is still plenty of opportunity to let those with questions know you have the answers. Or at least one they will agree to come by. Publish! Blog! With no strings attached. You’ll get attention, more questions and honest feedback in return. You may as well take a few punches when you give a bad answer. But hey, as long as you admit you’ve made a mistake and learnt from it in the form of a better answer, you might even get their money. Isn’t that worth trying?

Gepostet unter Fallbeispiele, PR & Marketing.

Schlagworte , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .


19 Kommentare

Die Diskussion zu diesem Artikel per RSS weiterverfolgen.

  1. Bjoern says

    definitely good thoughts, worth discussing. but do you really think this is a problem of different cultures (us vs. europe) or approaches or just different perspectives how trustworthy – or call it “real” – communication works? some might say spam is an ideal tool to reach people (someone has to say so, think of that masses of spam in your inbox) and they might even have perfect studies to proof that. there are still too many people thinking in a top-down-way, and those definitely need that top-down-way of communication, as they believe in it. maybe this will change. hopefully this will change. however i think there will have to be thousands of further communication 2.0 presentations, studies, speeches, articles, etc. until this will change. but it will. sometimes.

  2. Wolfgang Lünenbürger-Reidenbach says

    I have to admit I am a bit biased b/c I worked for six years with a wire service that builds its business around press releases aso. But I think you are right in most points.
    The only problem I see: at least back in 2000 this spamming press releases really worked. And still you oftenr wonder what kind of no-news make it to the press.

    On the other hand: Yes, a lot of my projects in social media work without any press release – and totally back your idea. So – how many press releases do you darft a day/ a week or so? :)

  3. Timo says

    Hi Tapio,
    good and improtant questions and points of view here. I hope to get my final thesis paper about the “social media release” as an ebook online next week. It goes in the same direction and adds some points. Also, just a quick thought, maybe we could do a socialmediapreview.de roundtable talk about this topic? I’ll talk to Bastian about this.

  4. Tapio says

    @Bjoern: To some extent, yes, I think it’s a matter of cultural differences. While many German clients, too, think of PR = press releases, they are more receptive to good advice. Maybe it’s the US press that works differently. Even our UK colleagues seem to get more response from releases than we do. You could argue for press releases like David Meerman Scott does. He says you should make “direct-to-consumer news releases” to fill the web with findable content. But I think that doesn’t really solve the problem of trust online.

    @Wolfgang: I have a good excuse. I wasn’t in this business in 2000 yet ;-). No, seriously, times have changed and PR has to go with it. We have the great opportunity to prove our worth by helping explain why things actually can work differently and re-build what advertising has torn down: genuine relationships between people in companies, that are also the people outside companies. Very Clutrain, I know, but it’s never been more true.

  5. Sebastian says

    First of all, good to see somebody from the big PR firms carrying the torch of “That’s not release-worthy”. That’s is definitely one starting point. Secondly, I agree with Bjoern in so far that it is not a culture thing. Maybe you have more US clients which give you the illusion but there are plenty European and German companies who think they need to broadcast although all they have is a sack of rice falling in China. Finally, the timing. I collected my thoughts on that matter almost two years ago (http://critic.typepad.com/planetsab/2006/08/pr_needs_to_cha.html), nothing has changed. Edelman has been pretty open, as well, now you join the conversation (I would be cool if you could get some of your higher brass to do an interview with you or more PR consultants from various companies). However, as long as the agency is dependend on the client’s wishes and clients comms personnel has not moved on a generation, we will see press releases. They have to prove they have been active. Press releases are easy activism and if they don’t “get ink” you can always blame it on the agency.

    PS: Have you read this? http://www.siliconvalleywatcher.com/mt/archives/2006/02/die_press_relea.php
    PPS: What is the bookmark plig-in at the end of your posts called?

  6. Tapio says

    @Timo: Great idea with with podcast roundtable. I’m on!

    @Sebastian: Maybe it’s also a matter of the part of the industry you look at. Enterprise IT companies breathe press releases. Digital media companies, maybe by nature, are less prolific. I like the SiliconValleyWatcher piece, but I’ve deliberately left out the discussion about social media releases. Just for the sake of clarity. Of course there are middle ways, but that’s not “What if..” is about.

    PS: The bookmark plugin is called “bookmark me”.

  7. Wolfgang Lünenbürger-Reidenbach says

    And, to add one thing, re/ social media news releases – I don’t think they are the clue to this train… Yes, they can be a tool internally, b/c you definitly see at once if your press release has no content, if you try to find it to put it down to bullet points :) But besides google juice I can’t see any real use of it right now. I even doubt this asian study about bloggers claiming they _want_ them. Who the hell really _wants_ them?

    (and glad to hear you have not been in business in the wild times. It was terrible.)

  8. Bastian Scherbeck says

    Hey Tapio,
    thanks for the great post! Concerning the cultural differences – I am all with you. At leas to my experience, american press release are even more filled up with PR-talk nobody is really interested in. American companies want you to translate their press releases directly and send them out in Germany – which never ever really works, cause nobody is interested in two pages of b******t.
    Like Timo said – it would be great to talk in a social media roundtable about this topic – Timo and I are going to figure sth out.

    @Wolfgang:Concerning the Social Media Releases I am not with you. I am sure myself that the concept needs to be developed further and is by far not finalized yet, but the Social Media Newsrooom as well as the Releases are on a good way and will – in the long run – get stronger and stronger.

    Greetings, Bastian

  9. Wolfgang Lünenbürger-Reidenbach says

    @Bastian: Yes – for the newsroom, I agree. But the release? You know we experiment with it as well, but i am not convinced. It’s just new cloths for an old thing.

    Social Media Newsroom is totally different and more about my idea of having original content that is movable and about becoming a digital curator…

  10. Timo says

    @Wolfgang: Concerning the SMR it depends, as always ;)
    In my opinion, if you use/see it as a press release plus multimedia content, I totally agree with you, that it’s just “new lipstick on the same old pig”. If you use/see it as the starting point for “the socialization of your news” it can clearly add much value to your online/social media communications. It all depends on why and how you use it. And of course the social media newsroom can play a big part in using it “the right way”.

1 2

Continuing the Discussion

  1. 2 Cent extra beim SMPReview Roundtable | Open Source PR hat zu diesem Artikel verlinkt. on 7. September 2008

    [...] durch meinen Post zum hypothetischen Ende der Pressemitteilung als PR-Werkzeug luden Bastian und Timo zum [...]